Critical Legal Research or Critical Legal Studies is a theoretical framework which asserts that the law is necessarily intertwined with social issues, particularly stating that the law has inherent social biases.
Who controls the creation/ availability of this information?
Whose voices are predominant in this space? Whose voices are excluded?
What are the shortcomings of traditional research practices that are predictive?
How might a reform-focused advocate conduct research differently? (Consider using this question where application of existing jurisprudence leads to an unjust result.)
How would someone working from a critical legal studies perspective view this research process or strategy?
Teaching Critical Information Literacy & Critical Legal Research